Tuesday, July 14, 2009

The Real Reason Restaurant Owners Don't Want Legally Permitted Gun Carriers in Their Places?

They won't be drinking alcohol, which is any establishments cash cow.

.

3 comments:

DirtCrashr said...

But they make excellent designated-drivers! Somebody's gotta do it.

Anonymous said...

Excuse me, but the proper term is "designated shooter," ....who can also drive. :)

sv

WV:ratels - where rodents stay on vacation

straightarrow said...

Wrong! A nice plausible theory, but wrong. The real reason they want to derail laws allowing carry in establishments that serve alcohol is so that they may employ the guns of the state to force all owners such establishments from permitting the carry of arms. That way they don't have to take a stand that may cost them customers. Either the timid illogical who believe the "blood in the sawdust" crap if they allow carry in their place of business or the man who elects to carry and takes himself and his family to a business more accepting of his rights.

It is ironic that they would try to get government to enforce, at gunpoint, lack of competition for clientele, all the while proclaiming that it is a public safety issue. NO, IT ISN'T. It is a non-compete issue, and they don't want to have to declare a position.