This time, she starts out comparing apples and oranges gun owners to bookstores.
While the Supreme Court gets to ponder whether or not to allow the D.C. handgun ban to stand, think about this: you’re not legally required to register your rifle, shotgun, or handgun in the state of Indiana, but if you own a bookstore in that state, you’re now required to register books that contain “sexually explicit materials,” according to a new law.It's too bad she had to start out with that bit of idiocy, because the rest of the article kinda makes sense. Obviously, it's not about guns.
I'm sure she has an anti-gun screed in the hopper, waiting to go.
No comments:
Post a Comment