Bryan Miller exclaims: You can't make this stuff up!.
Bryan, we don't have to make stuff up, but you do.
You'll see that pro-gunners place much of the blame for Westroads Mall and other"So called"? That's what the signs say. Signs that are allowed by law. We didn't make that up.
mass shootings, including the Virginia Tech gun massacre, on so-called 'gun free
zones.'
It's extremely difficult to gain a license to carry concealed in the Garden
State, so we don't have testosterone-challenged bozos legally packing heat at
the mall. Whew!
I know a lot of women who would take exception to your statement. Then again, compared to you, they may be carrying higher levels of testosterone. Whew!
For pro-gunners it's about arming everyone to the teeth.
Liar. You made that up.
I, sadly, have a little more experience with overwhelming firepower than do the
pro-gunners seeking to rationalize their petty personal fears and desires by
pretending that they're seeking to defend the rest of us. My only brother, FBI
Special Agent Mike Miller, was one of three law enforcement officers killed (a
fourth was grievously wounded) by a lone gunman wielding a concealed assault
pistol at Washington, DC Metropolitan Police Headquarters in November 1994.
Quite possibly the only true thing you've ever written about guns. I'm sorry for your loss. I'm sorry any time we lose good people to bad ones.
But
What's a concealed assault pistol? No such thing, liar. You made that up, too.
So, rather than blaming those who would hope to reduce gun violence by seeking
to limit the presence of lethal weapons in public, we should applaud and
encourage them. We should also enact a meaningful federal Assault Weapons Ban
(unlike the AWB that expired in '04, which gun manufacturers figured out how to
get around in no time), similar to New Jersey's state ban, that would actually
ban the sale and possession of these outrageous weapons. The secret to societal
safety is not more firepower in civilian hands. Quite the opposite.
I'll consider supporting a ban if you can tell me, without equivication, what an "assault weapon" is. You'll also have to provide proof as to the effectiveness of such a ban.
Of course, you'll have to do this without making anything up.
(BTW: I urge readers to check out some of the 'you can't make this up' nuttiness
that will undoubtedly appear in the Comments section below and has followed each of my earlier entries. Craaaazy!)
You sure do use the word "crazy" a lot. You have facts presented to you, but you refuse to accept them. You belittle anyone who disagrees with you. Is that not crazy? Pro-gun people come to your site, hoping to shed some light on your stupidity. They stay above the fray, calmly pointing out your many inaccuracies, but it's wasted time.
Me? I'm done with that. You call names, get all over-the-top and I'll do the same, liar. I'm not afraid to sink to your level rhetorically. The one thing I won't do is lie, because I don't have to.
You go ahead and get all Carolyn McCarthy on us, I don't care. You honor no one with your antics. Or your lies.
And here is the rest of it.
2 comments:
Only one reason why...
anti-gunners want guns banned: so their own body guards will p0wn anyone who comes near their money grabbin bodies.
Look at Oprah, hates guns but her body guards are like something out of a Predator movie.
But more of what Pro Gunners should be afraid of, is the underside of the California Ammo Microstamping legislation. Anti-Gun groups think this will limit hand gun killings and be able to trace the bullets and weapons to the person who pulled the trigger.
A) The criminals will just buy the black market older weapons for their covert usage
B) Only Law abiding citizens will buy the microstamping guns.
C) Rebecca Peters and George Soros will definately hitch a ride on the California legislation and drag it to the UN, where they hope to make the world, free of small arms.
All just so we all can become slaves to any government who has weapons larger than 9mm with rates of fire similar to a real assault weapons, not the semi-auto's currently classified incorrectly in the media as 'assault' weapons.
Maybe Bryan ignores definitions and any medium used to inform, like: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle
People like myself, Vietnam Vets or any Vet with plenty of firearm experience, will tell you that weapon was a tool, not a hollywood sensational item to be glorified and exhaulted as it has been today: a killing machine or as I say, the "they've got a gun!" mentality.
If they where so worried about rates of death, they should start in the banning of automobiles, which kill at a rate of 40:1 to civillain owned fire arms, per year in this country.
My statistics might not be entirely accurate, but with a little research, anyone can find the numbers.
Take for example MADD: 20% of all fatal car accidents are caused by Drunk or otherwise impaired drivers. Well, guess we should blame the sober people for the other 80%? As it is said, statistics lie and will be used by the semi-itelligent types to get the other semi-intelligent types to believe their ignorance.
I'm with you Rustmeister:
"Me? I'm done with that. You call names, get all over-the-top and I'll do the same, liar. I'm not afraid to sink to your level rhetorically. The one thing I won't do is lie, because I don't have to."
-Cheers, Kbl.
By kbl at 2007-12-21 14:28
Damn skippy
They know they're losing, and will do anything to keep their agenda in play.
By Rustmeister at 2007-12-21 19:42
Post a Comment